FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Monday, July 20. 2026
New Bipartisan Bill Seeks to Outlaw Criticism of Israel and Jewish Power…
Last year’s defeat of the Antisemitism Awareness Act (AAA) by a coalition of progressive Democrats and patriotic Republicans caught the Jewish community off guard.
According to a report by Jewish Insider, Chuck Schumer and his Republican collaborator’s attempt to sneak the AAA into the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act was thwarted when a coalition of nationalist podcasters such as Tucker Carlson and various Palestine sympathetic left-wing groups called attention to its draconian provisions and drew backlash to the bill.
Rather than give up, Jewish groups reeling from the defeat have decided to launch a renewed offensive, this time attacking opposition to their Zionist agenda at its root: freedom of speech, especially on social media.
In May and June, a bipartisan coalition of 15 House Republicans and 14 Democrats formally sponsored the Jewish American Security Act (JASA), a piece of legislation that if passed would constitute one of the most sweeping attacks on the First Amendment in American history. The bill enjoys practically universal backing from Jewish non-profits and Zionist activist groups.
The new law presents four major demands: the appointment of a specialized Anti-Semitism commissar to manage the Department of Education’s campaign combating pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses, a $1 billion dollar cash injection to “secure” Zionist non-profits and Jewish houses of worship, mandatory state monitoring of online social media platforms in order to force them to censor “anti-Semitic” political speech on their platforms, and officially reorienting the mission of the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and National Counterintelligence and Security Center as instruments for targeting critics of Jews and Israel as foreign enemy actors and domestic terrorists.
This sounds like a chapter out of George Orwell’s book ‘1984’. Who does our government think they are to tell us who we have to like and embrace? I don’t see ‘we the people’ accepting this attack on our First Amendment right to free speech. When you actually think about it, this would be like the old tale of the ‘inlaw’ jokes where some people say they dislike their in-laws. Maybe your in-laws but in on your personal finances, or try to control you by saying you must watch certain television programs, or that you must sit an watch pornography with them, or better yet, say in-laws are fighting with their much larger neighbors, and they insist you come fight their neighbors because they are too weak! I think you get the message here.