We Believe:

A healthy environment is essential to the well-being of a nation, but true conservation must be rooted in wisdom, local control, and respect for the people who live closest to the land. For generations, rural Americans have been the stewards of the nation’s forests, farms, rivers, and open spaces. They understand the land not as an abstract policy issue, but as the foundation of their livelihoods, communities, and heritage. Environmental stewardship is a moral responsibility, but it must be exercised without surrendering national sovereignty, property rights, or the independence of rural communities. Conservation must strengthen the nation, not weaken it through overregulation, forced urbanization, or policies that place global agendas above American interests.

We believe that environmental policy must protect America’s natural resources, preserve its agricultural capacity, and defend the rural way of life from threats such as overdevelopment, corporate consolidation, and international “sustainable development” schemes that undermine local control. The land is not merely scenery; it is the backbone of America’s food supply, economic stability, and cultural identity.

PLANK 1: Protecting America’s Rural Land and Open Spaces

America is losing rural land at an alarming rate. According to data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the NumbersUSA Education & Research Foundation, approximately 25 million acres of rural land, including forests, rangeland, pastures, cropland, and wetlands, have been converted into developed land in recent decades. This transformation has replaced open countryside with subdivisions, freeways, factories, strip malls, airports, and other forms of urban sprawl. During the 1990s alone, rural land was lost at a rate of 2.2 million acres per year, a pace that threatens the long term stability of America’s agricultural and ecological systems.

If this rate continues, the United States will lose an additional 110 million acres of rural countryside by 2050 — an area roughly equal to the combined size of Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Virginia. This loss is not theoretical; it is happening now. Between 2002 and 2010, more than 8.3 million acres of farmland and natural habitat were destroyed, an area larger than the entire state of Maryland — cleared, scraped, paved, and built over in less than a decade. Once these lands are lost, they cannot be reclaimed. The destruction of open spaces is permanent, and its consequences will be felt for generations.

PLANK 2: Population Growth, Development Pressure, and Environmental Decline

Environmental degradation cannot be separated from population growth. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, America’s population is projected to grow by 70 million people over the next 40 years, with immigration accounting for roughly 90% of this increase. By 2100, the Census Bureau’s medium projection estimates a population of 571 million — more than double today’s population. This growth places enormous pressure on land, water, infrastructure, and food production.

Research from NumbersUSA shows that around 70% of land loss around urbanized areas in the last decade was directly tied to population growth and the need to house more people. As the population expands, development spreads outward, consuming farmland, forests, and natural habitats. If cropland loss continues at the rate observed from 1992–1997, the United States will lose 110 million acres of its remaining 375 million acres of cropland — nearly 30% of its food producing land. The combination of relentless development and land degradation is shrinking America’s productive agricultural base at the very moment when population driven demand is increasing.

If current trends continue, the nation will lose over 55 million acres of cropland by 2050 — roughly 15% of its remaining farmland. A nation that cannot feed itself cannot remain sovereign. Food security is inseparable from environmental stewardship, and both depend on a stable population and the protection of rural land.

PLANK 3: Defending Rural America from Forced Urbanization and Global Agendas

We oppose international “sustainable development” schemes — such as the United Nations’ Agenda 21 and similar initiatives — that pressure nations to concentrate populations into dense urban centers under the guise of environmental protection. These programs encourage policies that push people out of rural areas and promote high density urban living as a global ideal. While presented as environmental policy, these initiatives often result in overcrowding, higher pollution concentration, weakened local autonomy, and the erosion of rural culture.

Such programs increase dependence on centralized infrastructure, reduce local control over land use, and expand federal and international influence over American communities. They undermine the independence of rural families, restrict traditional land use, and encourage a model of development that disconnects people from the land. Rural Americans have managed forests, rivers, and farmland for centuries. They do not need global institutions dictating how they should live, farm, or use their land. Environmental stewardship must be driven by local communities — not international bureaucracies.

PLANK 4: Protecting American Agriculture from Corporate Consolidation

America’s food supply is increasingly controlled by a small number of multinational corporations. This consolidation reduces competition, weakens local farming, and concentrates food production into fewer hands. When a handful of conglomerates control the nation’s food supply, the risks multiply: contamination becomes more dangerous, supply chain disruptions become more severe, and local communities lose the ability to sustain themselves independently.

Corporate consolidation disconnects food production from the communities that depend on it. It undermines family farms, accelerates the decline of rural towns, and places the nation’s food security in the hands of entities whose priorities may not align with the well being of the American people. A secure nation requires a decentralized, locally rooted agricultural system. Family farms, small producers, and regional food networks are essential to national resilience. When food production is controlled by a handful of conglomerates, the nation becomes vulnerable — economically, environmentally, and strategically.

PLANK 5: Ensuring Food Security and Protecting America’s Agricultural Future

The loss of cropland, combined with population growth and corporate consolidation, threatens America’s long term food security. A nation that loses its farmland, outsources its food production, concentrates agriculture into corporate monopolies, and allows uncontrolled population growth is a nation that risks losing its independence. Food security is national security. Protecting farmland, supporting local agriculture, and ensuring a stable population trajectory are essential to preserving America’s ability to feed itself.

PLANK 6: Conservation Without Over Regulation

We support responsible conservation that protects natural resources without crippling rural communities through excessive regulation. Federal agencies have too often restricted land use, imposed burdensome environmental rules, limited access to water, timber, and grazing, punished small farmers and landowners, and favored corporate interests over local families. True conservation respects both the land and the people who depend on it. Environmental policy must be balanced, practical, and rooted in local knowledge — not dictated by distant bureaucracies or global institutions.

PLANK 7: Population, Demographics, and Environmental Sustainability

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, non Hispanic white children are no longer the majority of the U.S. school age population. This demographic shift reflects broader population trends driven largely by immigration and higher population growth in urbanized regions. Environmental sustainability cannot be separated from population policy. A nation must consider land capacity, water availability, food production, infrastructure limits, and environmental impact when determining immigration levels and long term population goals.

We affirm that environmental stewardship requires a stable, sustainable population. Policies that dramatically increase population, without regard for land, resources, or infrastructure — are incompatible with environmental protection. A nation that exhausts its land and resources cannot preserve its sovereignty or its future